Using Otter.ai for D&D sessions, and the point where it stops
Otter is a good meeting transcriber and plenty of DMs have tried pointing it at a session. The thing that goes wrong is not accuracy — it is that a D&D session is not shaped like a meeting, and Otter’s limits are drawn around meetings.
The short version
Otter transcribes meetings well. The problem is length: it caps a single conversation at 30 minutes on the free plan and 90 minutes on Pro, and a typical session runs three to five hours. The first plan that covers a four-hour session is Business. If you want to try Otter on a session anyway, split the recording first — and expect to fix the names by hand.
The numbers, with sources
| What | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Basic (free) — transcription minutes per month | 300 monthly transcription minutes | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| Basic (free) — length of a single conversation | 30 minutes | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| Basic (free) — audio/video file imports | 3 lifetime audio/video file imports | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| Basic (free) — conversation history retained | The 25 most recent conversations; older ones are archived rather than deleted | sourceas of 2026-08-05 |
| Pro — price | $16.99 per user per month, or $8.33 per user per month billed annually | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| Pro — length of a single meeting | Up to 90 mins/meeting | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| Pro — audio/video file imports | 10 monthly audio/video file imports | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| Business — price | $30 per user per month, or $19.99 per user per month billed annually | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| Business — length of a single meeting | Up to 4 hours/meeting | sourceas of 2026-09-07 |
| DM Scribe, for comparison | One upload covers a session up to 8 hours / 500 MB; free plan 2.5 hours/month, paid from $7.99/month for 10 hours | DM Scribe pricingas of 2026-09-07 |
How we sourced this: The plan figures above were re-read from Otter’s own pricing page on 2026-09-07. The conversation-history row comes from Otter’s help centre, which returns 403 to automated requests — that line was read from a search engine’s index of Otter’s article on 2026-08-05 rather than fetched directly, so treat it as the weakest row in the table and check it yourself if you are deciding on it.
The length problem, in numbers
A session is the whole evening. Ours run about four hours including the part where nobody can decide what to buy in town. Otter’s caps are per conversation, not per month, so the monthly minute allowance is not the binding constraint — the per-conversation ceiling is.
On the free plan that ceiling is 30 minutes. On Pro it is 90. Neither is a session. The first tier that covers four hours in one recording is Business, at $30 per user per month billed monthly. For comparison, one DM Scribe upload takes a session up to 8 hours and 500 MB whole — recordings over four hours are split and reassembled automatically on our side, not yours.
- Free: 30 minutes per conversation — roughly the first fight
- Pro: 90 minutes per conversation — about half a session
- Business: up to 4 hours per meeting — a session, just about
The workaround, and what it costs you
You can split the recording and upload it in pieces, and people do. Two things make that worse than it sounds. The free plan allows three audio or video file imports for the life of the account, not three per month, so splitting a session into chunks spends your entire import allowance on one evening. Pro raises that to ten a month, which a weekly game in 90-minute pieces will use most of.
The second cost is that the seams land mid-scene. A transcript broken into arbitrary chunks is still searchable, but anything that reads across the whole session — a recap, a summary, a question about what happened — now has to be done per chunk and stitched by you.
Names are the other half of it
Meeting transcription is tuned for meetings, where the proper nouns are ordinary names and company jargon. A campaign is mostly invented words, and a general model has never seen any of them. The same NPC comes back spelled three ways across three sessions, and the archive stops being searchable at exactly the point where it would start being useful.
This is the reason DM Scribe exists as its own product rather than a complaint about Otter. Before your audio is transcribed, we assemble a short vocabulary from the campaign itself — glossary terms with their pronunciations, the player characters, the nicknames the table actually uses — and hand it to the model as context, so Thordak arrives as Thordak in session nine because session eight taught us to expect him. See how that works.
What Otter does that we do not
Otter joins live meetings on Zoom, Teams and Meet and takes notes in the room, which is a genuinely different product from uploading a file afterwards. It has a mobile app built for recording in person. If you also sit in work meetings all week, one subscription covering both is a real argument, and we do not have an answer to it.
You should pick Otter if…
You want one transcription tool for work and for the game, and the game is the smaller half of that. Otter is a better meeting product than we will ever be, because we are not trying to be one.
You should also pick Otter if your sessions are short. A two-hour online game recorded in two halves fits Pro comfortably, and if you do not need a wiki, a recap or the names to stay consistent across a campaign, a transcript is all you were after.
- You need live meeting notes on Zoom, Teams or Meet
- You want one tool covering work meetings and the game
- Your sessions are short enough to fit a 90-minute cap
- You want a transcript and nothing built on top of it
Other comparisons
- World Anvil
World Anvil is built for authoring a world before you play it. Remembering what happened while you did is a different job. Which one you actually need.
- Kanka
Kanka’s free tier, what each paid tier adds, whether it has AI, and self-hosting — from Kanka’s own pages, dated. When do notes from your sessions win?
- LegendKeeper
What LegendKeeper’s free plan can and cannot do, what Pro costs, how the trial works, and when session notes matter more than maps. Which do you need?
- Obsidian and Notion
Obsidian is free and local, Notion is cloud and collaborative, and neither one hears your session. What that actually costs you over a long campaign.
- Descript
Descript meters transcription as media minutes, and a four-hour session spends 240 of them. What each plan covers for a weekly game, with sources.
- Archivist AI
Archivist meters sessions, we meter hours. That one difference decides which is cheaper for your table, and it is not the same answer for everyone.
- The DM's ARK
The DM’s ARK tags who spoke; we do not. We have a free plan that never expires; they do not. Those two facts decide most of it.
- Saga20
Saga20 recognizes each player’s voice and meters by the session. We meter by the hour. The same table prices out differently — which meter fits yours?
- Tabletop Arc
Tabletop Arc meters audio in minutes — 30 free, 300 for $9. A four-hour session is 240. Whose meter fits your table, and where does Arc genuinely win?
- GM Assistant
GM Assistant sells hours as credits and labels speakers from per-player tracks, which we cannot. Which costs less for a weekly four-hour game?
- Loreify
Loreify sells unlimited sessions for $15 a month or two for $7; we sell hours. How long and how often you play decides which is cheaper. Which are you?